robdyck

Members
  • Posts

    4497
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by robdyck

  1. If that's a stone watertable / sill, you can modify a library material so that you get the appearance of joints every 24" as well as vertical pattern lines. 

    Assign this material to the molding that's in your library and that will save some steps down the road.

    A good material to start with is shown below. In the past, I've used some of the maps from the tiled version and added them to the Slate(mocha) texture. Resize to 144"x144", adjust the pattern and color blend...

    image.thumb.png.1e5afe4b65756118ff28ad9f58d15814.png

    • Like 1
  2. 32 minutes ago, Ryan-M said:

    Can you do the work to create an emissive face/rectangle with a specific orientation once and then add it to the library for future use?

    This isn't my post, but I just did that and compared a scene using a 'face' versus and added light. The emissive properties of the face did create much better scene lighting, even if the added light did not cast shadows and have the same lumens as the 'face' material.

    My 'face' was 24"x24", top at 88" above the floor (the room had a high ceiling), and I used the material 'Lighting - White' with no adjustments. 

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
  3. Your results may be dependent on the tools you've used. Chief models the driveways / sidewalk / curbs to meet, but they aren't creating actual terrain elevation data so the grass region does not conform. Manual terrain input can override this.

    Another easy way to avoid that is to use a rolled gutter / curb / sidewalk, if that's regionally appropriate. Personally, I find that Chief's curb / driveway tools don't provide me with the control and realism that I prefer.

    image.thumb.png.313f96c0ad5eb93542a56f8b36cdfeb3.png

  4. 2 hours ago, Ange822 said:

    I would be happy to share this user catalog I created if you would use it? :)

    Thanks for the offer! I can tell you that I would not use it simply because you and I have different needs for these types of components. My guess is that your work with your employer gives you the need to re-use some of these. In my work of custom homes, every time I need timber components they really are unique to the project and I have to be careful not to re-use them!

  5. 6 hours ago, Michael_Gia said:

    At 50 samples I can actually move around in realtime on the PC. 

    Interesting! Could you post a screen capture video of that in progress? The windows snipping tool does video record that you can easily copy then paste into the forum post.

  6. 6 hours ago, Ange822 said:

    @robdyck Okay no worries, I do still have all the blocks I just didn't save them. I will do that for reference. I was hoping it would be easier to modify the symbol after the fact.

    Am I missing something though in that Chief article where it says to edit / right click and open the symbol to edit?

     

    Thanks for your help with this!

    The editing of a symbol like a gable end truss is limited to what you can accomplish by using stretch planes and deleting surfaces to create new symbols. I actually wouldn't recommend using a symbol at all for a deco. truss.

    Just use the arch. block. Very easy to explode and adjust as the design evolves, or replace from the library when the roof pitch / scale changes. Obviously, this means saving new versions of the arch. block.

    If you use a lot of timber components, which I know you do, I'd suggest having a Chief Plan file just to store all these arch. blocks, posts, beams, etc. in addition to adding frequently used items to your library.

     

    Keep in mind that you can make more elaborate deco. trusses using...wait for it...a truss! A 3d solid would be my last resort for modelling these. 

     

    Lots of different ways, all with pros and cons. The best method is somewhat dependent on EXACTLY how you will be using it. Is it for elevation views, renders, materials lists, construction component detail drawings, schedules...?

    • Like 1
  7. 2 hours ago, winterdd said:

    Hey guys, second floor of the home has either i-joists or webbed trusses. I am having requests for tray ceilings under the second floor. Is this possible and can you even cut into floor members to do this? I mean if I am using 16" i joists or trusses and the minimum tray depth is 12" that doesn't leave much structure.

    This is easier with floor trusses than with I-joists, but either one could be possible depending on the load and span. If you already have 16" for the floor system, then check to see if 11 7/8" or 12" is suitable for the span / load of the floor above.

  8. 5 minutes ago, GeneDavis said:

    Roof returns are done to eliminate the bad architectural practice of having a pork chop end, and unless you give a return its own return, including frieze wrap, as is done by using the molding, you get a pork chop.

     

    I had a great pork chop at a steak joint called Perry's the other night.  But I don't like to see them on roof corners.

    Boxed eaves, which sounds much nicer than 'pork chops', are built to eliminate the costs associated with roof returns, allowing homeowners to occasionally visit a steak house and not have the embarrassment of publicly ordering a pork chop!;)

    • Like 2
  9. 15 minutes ago, stevenyhof said:

    While this is a remodel, and the As-Built trim work is not that important, what I have learned is that using roof frieze moldings does not end the boards properly at the gable end of the returns, whereas using a poly molding did work well.

    Very good point. Using a molding polyline is also what I would have done to match the existing condition.

    • Upvote 1
  10. Hey Steve, I've made some simple adjustments which will be very easy for you to follow.

    1. This corner has multiple roof planes in the same location

    image.thumb.png.e62270684db432de66663017717b2987.png

     

    2. All of these 9:12 roof returns are not accurately built

    image.thumb.png.1a7934b0dde968c15dee2847f05d4eee.png

     

    image.thumb.png.d76eebbb6a0c78221de2adb888aa5628.png

    This can be identified easily by zooming in really tight and by changing the Number Style to decimal inches. Copy the fascia elevation from the main roof plane and paste that to all roof return roof planes. Then, reconnect the hips of the roof returns.

    Lastly, cut, then paste-in-place one of the main roof planes.

    • Upvote 1
  11. There is no way to auto-rename them. What I prefer to do in the instance you describe is to add the new elevation and name it E4.1...and so on.

    I simply don't have time to redo everything because of a single change and over the years I have learned to accept the function of the software rather to fight against it. Adaptation is key!

    • Like 1