jtcapa1

Members
  • Posts

    369
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jtcapa1

  1. Still it is not parametric or anything, you are forced to use 3d models of various elements and build, set them in place. This is a slow tedious process, but obviously looks great on a 3d model
  2. I'm with Joe here. I've tried customizing the labels for each window like (N)3040 X0, but should I change the window, it does not change on the plan. Can get into trouble fast if your not careful. I found the Architect's method of using symbols that refer to a schedule to be much safer in the long run. Plus cleaner. Just not as easy for a contactor to work with.
  3. Can you guys that use Layer 0, provide a graphic example of what yours looks like? I've had some issues with using this method when I send it to a printer, plus what lays over it.
  4. AutoCAD has a very easy to use paint tool called "matchprop" that applies the properties of a selected object to other objects clicked upon. CA has something clunkier, and I was wondering if I've missed something more useful like the ACAD version???
  5. There is also a neat trick to get the railing to the outside of the deck so it looks like its mounted correctly using one invisible railing and another visible one just outside that.