-
Posts
159 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
30 ExcellentAbout amddrafting
- Birthday 08/02/1976
Contact Methods
- Website URL
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Lubbock, Texas
Recent Profile Visitors
5354 profile views
-
I may have answered my own question, in doing some testing I found that Auto Framing was on by unchecking all auto framing it did help quite a bit which would make sense if it has to rebuild the framing everytime you nudge a wall in the slightest movement. Still seems slow for typical operation however but it has improved.
-
My staff and I have noticed significant slow down in performance lately. We mostly all use the same computers except for one and we all experience the same issues. Usually once a plan gets over a certain size and / or we begin populating it with cabinets and other fixtures it can take 3-7 seconds to refresh with every move. CA support says it's my fills in my wall types but we have tested this by removing all fills with no impact. The only thing I can think is maybe there are some library objects I have created lately that might be slowing it down however these are not anything created outside of what CA already has provided in their library and mostly still basic. I would love to hear some feedback if anyone has experienced this and what you did to resolve the lag if you were able.
-
Nevermind... just found this exact example in the Ruby Script Tutorial height = room.ceiling_elevation - room.floor_elevation nf = NumberFormatter.new nf.unit = "'-\"" # Hyphenated feet and inches nf.use_fractions = true nf.apply(height)
-
I'm using the script below to make ceiling height indicators in the framing plan and the current output is 9 FT-1 1/8 IN using this code... nf = NumberFormatter.new nf.unit = 'ft-in' nf.use_fractions = true nf.denominator = 8 nf.show_unit = true nf.apply(room.ceiling_elevation) I want it to output 9'-1 1/8" instead. Is it possible to do this without extensive coding?
-
Ruby Script Item for Calculating Occupancy Load
amddrafting replied to amddrafting's topic in Symbols and Content
If he's down, I'm down. -
Ruby Script Item for Calculating Occupancy Load
amddrafting replied to amddrafting's topic in Symbols and Content
Wow man, this was my next thought on how I could use "Room Type" and define them in a commercial template as such. Then if the "Room Type" was "Business", "Assembly", "Educational", etc. It would automatically update the label and update the occupancy calculation. Super powerful tool and kicking myself for nothing thinking of this stuff sooner. -
Ruby Script Item for Calculating Occupancy Load
amddrafting replied to amddrafting's topic in Symbols and Content
Amazing! Thank you so much! This works perfectly. Now the next step will be taking that result and multiplying it by .2 to get inches required for openable door clearance code requirement. Any thoughts? It would be an if / then scenario. Ultimate goal would be to get the second number in this graph to display required door opening clearance. Minimum is 32" but if it exceeds 32" then I would want it to show the actual required amount. Then I'll need a macro that will count width of doors provided (if labeled "egress') in the room The end goal would be to just have these in the library that I could paste into the room depending on the room type. But I'd love to take it a step further and only need one object that could be place in any room and pick up the room type and change the calculation as needed based on the room type definition. (see my post below in response to Rabbit) -
Morning all... I'm trying to create a macro to calculate the occupancy load of a room by taking the interior square footage of the room and dividing it by the occupancy load for occupancy type. Using ChatGPT I got the result of this macro that should help me get the result I need but it's not working. I assume I first have to get rid of the unit text in order to divide by the occupant load I want to divide by. So this is the code it came up with. Anyone ruby script people know what is wrong here? Does this need to be different because it's in CA? Any help would be appreciated. source_information = %room.area.internal% numeric_part = source_information.match(/\d+/)[0] numeric_value = numeric_part.to_i result = numeric_value / 20 puts result
-
Funny, I searched "Room Numbers" and got none of these results otherwise I wouldn't have posted it
-
Good morning folks. Since we are getting into more commercial work it is more common for us to display room numbers on plans. I noticed that the schedule has an option to show room numbers but there is no macro for us to be able to include room numbers to display in a text box or even in the room label that I can find. Is this a possibility or are we stuck manually entering in room numbers?
-
Talking to a Pella rep this morning I had mentioned the library and named the series we have access to, and they told me that those names / series are about 5 years outdated. I realize that this is something that is probably not a priority for CA, but I just want to advise whoever that you might want to look into updating your Manufacturer libraries to current specifications/names. If you use Pella windows in the Manufacturers Catalogue, I was advised they can get close to what those were, but they are not the same anymore.
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
Default Tub Symbol won't generate 2D symbol after stretching
amddrafting replied to amddrafting's topic in General Q & A
Smoothing angle fixed it. Thank you. Even though I have "Always Ask" checked it doesn't ask me anymore when I go to adjust it. It's what I'm used to seeing and that's why it's never been an issue until recently. Not sure why it's not asking me anymore. -
This has never happened until recently. When I go to stretch a tub to fit the specified dimension I need it loses it's 2D info. When I click "generate block" in the 2D section of the tub dbx it won't generate the symbol or won't automatically update when the setting is set to auto generate. It's just a box showing the drains. Any Thoughts?