-
Posts
1256 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by stevenyhof
-
Dimension format changes, and other "bugs"
stevenyhof replied to stevenyhof's topic in General Q & A
Thank you everyone for chiming in! If/when I run into the other things I mentioned, I will try to do a video to show it. -
Dimension format changes, and other "bugs"
stevenyhof replied to stevenyhof's topic in General Q & A
Thank you -
Dimension format changes, and other "bugs"
stevenyhof replied to stevenyhof's topic in General Q & A
I did share this with support, but also here in case others run into this or have some ideas as to what might be causing this to happen. Thank you, Eric! -
Please see the video for details https://www.loom.com/share/ca89a8f7dfac472aa0ffc72c9d2e1eb3 Thank you, Steve
-
Yes, that is what I got as well. But I have messed with my default walls for X13 so want to just make new walls and see if it is an issue. Thank you for looking!
- 8 replies
-
- x13
- door opening
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Yes, I see. hmmm. I use the same walls for X12. But removing the footing did fix the floor. Thank you, I will look more into this
- 8 replies
-
- x13
- door opening
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I agree. I took the screen shot earlier and the when I was doing the video I was shocked at how it was looking. But on the second floor all is fine. I did mess with my walls and work to perfect things yesterday for X13. X12 is all fine so I might have some defaults not set up yet.
- 8 replies
-
- x13
- door opening
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Here is the plan. Thank you! BMI1962 Kiser Residence X13.zip
- 8 replies
-
- x13
- door opening
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hello, in X13 I am running into this sill issue in the lower level https://www.loom.com/share/9787f55385c74cd8b04753fb13eee91f Thank you
- 8 replies
-
- x13
- door opening
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Yes, so if you have sections (section lines) in your floor it will do nothing. Once I shut the layer off it worked. Thank you for that info!!
- 12 replies
-
- new template
- import plan
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
That is good info - I will check that
- 12 replies
-
- new template
- import plan
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Oh yes!
- 12 replies
-
- new template
- import plan
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Db - Dialog Box
- 12 replies
-
- new template
- import plan
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
sure!!! now it just worked without a hiccup - cool!! Thank you
- 12 replies
-
- new template
- import plan
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
or... maybe it will still work - testing now
- 12 replies
-
- new template
- import plan
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
No - see above image on my first post - it gives me an Db and does nothing
- 12 replies
-
- new template
- import plan
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
My brain! Your question makes me believe I must be missing something obvious.
- 12 replies
-
- new template
- import plan
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Not sure what that would do. I need to copy an old plan into a new template.
- 12 replies
-
- new template
- import plan
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hello, I have continually updated (exported) my layers, defaults, etc and imported them into older jobs where I am using the older plan for a new job. However, there are things I have done with my .plan template (always fine tuning) that have other things I would like to have for a new drawing. I even tried to copy the plan floor to paste into a new plan, but that does not work. When I draw condos, I use an existing plan, copy and rename for a new drawing. It would be nice as I learn more and fine tune things to have those things available. What do others do to accomplish this? https://www.loom.com/share/57602a5852f14e4ba4272bf383018a5a
- 12 replies
-
- new template
- import plan
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Ah! I understand. Thank you
-
Here is a final update on what I did... https://www.loom.com/share/2583d3cb491c44c5b3f2016d66fb9d41
-
So I think I am all back to working again, but again, can anyone else verify that FormatterHeightSixteenths does in fact show obj.depth. I changed it to obj.height and now it is working.
-
And now it is working... Chief may want to look into this. Maybe Height and Depth give the same result, but something went wrong only by me making a copy of the formattedHeightSixteenths macro
-
I did not touch this, but noticed that FormatterDepthSixteenths and FormatterHeightSixteenths have the same code for obj.depth. So I did changed the FormatterHeightSixteenths to obj.height and now it gives me a valid number in the Expanded Macro Value field.
-
Hmmm Now many are back showing valid