HumbleChief

Members
  • Posts

    6058
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by HumbleChief

  1. Really looks like a video issue. Before I upgraded my video card I would get choppy renders like you're showing. I suspect, like Doug above, that the retina display is asking more of your video card than the older machine.

     

    One thing you can try is a smaller model, like 4 walls and a roof. See if that's also choppy. If it's not then your model size is probably stressing the video capabilities of your newer machine. If it's still choppy then either the video card is simply undersized/spec'd for Chief rendering engine with the retina display or there are other issues over my pay grade. BTW none of that helps with the frustration I know none to well. Let us know if you resolve the issues.

  2. I usually leave them on but I have an exterior RT that I'd like to have the lights turned off and I'm not getting it. I've attached the plan and it should show the (2) front porch lights turned 'off' in the light data sheet and shown as used in Camera view only but they seem to shine just as bright as they were when turned 'on'. I can delete then replace the lights post RT but am curious about the settings and how they really work (don't work?)

     

    Here's the plan and a pic showing the lights still on.

     

    post-302-0-45452300-1416926481_thumb.png

     

    RAY TRACE QUESTION.zip

  3. First off,  I do not use a MAC mouse,  I have a logitech,  I did not like the MAC mouse for CA.  I have a MAC mouse on home IMAC,  and I miss the logitech mouse on home IMAC.

     

    Yes,  I have a zoom wheel on my logitech,  and I use it all the time when working with CA,  love it.  However,  I think you are referring to having to use the +,- key to zoom in on PDF's,  yes,  I have to use the +,- on PDF's,  the zoom wheel does not work.

    Ah yes - same here. Thought you were zooming in with CA. Thanks.

  4. Firs off thanks again for the video. I think I solved this a while back but am learning still.

     

    Scott I have a MAC question (sorry for the highjack). Do you not have a zoom wheel on your mouse or must you use the + and - buttons to zoom and pan as your video shows? Always remember Mac mices not having the same options as Windows mices but was just curious.

  5. Rich,

     

    I'm not an engineer and this assumes you've calc'd the new I-Beam to carry the loads you'll be carrying, given that, we work with steel quite often and your design should work fine but it's a bit overkill based on the engineered designs I've used in the past. Overkill is typically a good thing (versus underkill - is that word?) but you can get away with a lot less and still be very safe structurally as the 4 X 6 post should provide very strong support. If your 4th picture is accurate you really just need to trap the I-Beams between 2 king posts just like you would with any other beam.

     

    Maybe turn the side supports into those king studs and and replace the bottom through bolt with a series of 16d nails, the upper through bolt eliminated and the angle brackets replaced with A-35's. Maybe add a strap across the 2 x 6's. This all depends on the actual loads and structural stresses which can't really be discerned from your post or pics but we use steel all the time and unless it's a moment frame or absorbing any particular shear stresses the construction techniques are really pretty simple.

     

    We will often fill the web with wood using tack welded studs to attach the wood fillers, then hang joists from the filler but that doesn't look like your case here. 

     

    Be ready for the chorus of don't do anyhting without and an engineer's blessing and this is always good advice but if you have the loads/spans figured out (which almost always takes an engineer) you should be fine.

     

    EDIT: Just read again and I see you're replacing load bearing walls. Do those walls contribute to the shear loads of the structure? That needs to replaced somehow if that's the case. Your design will most likely not serve that purpose. Que chorus singing, "Make sure it's engineered properly."

  6. You can 'snip' them (in Windows it's the snipping tool) in your PDF viewer and get them cropped tight to the edges, then import into Chief - works pretty well. Might even start doing that myself as the png's behave so much better than the PDF's.

     

    Still can get only 3 landscape images across on a Layout page so don't really see the point.

  7. Feel your pain and the new landscape layout makes it even worse. Even with the blank spaces eliminated still can't fit more pages no a Layout can you? I often take the default 8.5 x 11 inch size and change it to 8 x (aspect ratio maintained) in the properties dbx. Makes them a little easier to fit.

  8. It seems like I had those same settings and crashed bad last week and had corrupted Archives as well - had to go to Carbonite to get usable file. Can't say I understand the archive function very well. Very interested in what tech support tells you.

  9. Larry,

    Thanks for the tip.

    Is there a global setting for that or do you set it once per drawing secession?

     

    Thanks

    Alan

    Set it once per plan file or template and use that plan/template for future projects. I think Chief comes with that box checked as default.

  10. OK cool, I was working on the problem he posted about but there's always more areas to repair if I've got anything to do with a plan.

     

    See if you can fix this anomaly after the walls are redefined. Oh Yeah same corner the OP posted about

     

    post-302-0-84289900-1416105219_thumb.png

  11. After adjusting the walls (and it's not for sure i got them right) it LOOKS like the line is gone. Didn't mess with the parapet wall.

     

    post-302-0-06188100-1416104372_thumb.png

     

    But when looking closely there's another, smaller double line that someone else might need to fix.

     

    post-302-0-75724800-1416104420_thumb.png