Ed_Orum

Members
  • Posts

    237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ed_Orum

  1. I drew this plan with 1/4"=1' for both dimensions and text.

    I saved the plan view.

    Then I duplicated the plan view, and gave it the name "1/8".

    I changed the default dimensions to 1/8"=1' for both dimensions and texts.

    I changed the text and dimensions from 1/4" to 1/8".

    I saved the plan view and closed it.

    When I opened the 1/4" Saved Plan View (the one I duplicated to make the 1/8" Saved Plan View) all of the dimensions and text were at 1/8".  Even thought they are different saved plan views with different properties for the text and dimensions, they will not operate independently of each other.
    What did I do wrong?

    Thanks in advance,

    Lane

  2. In past versions there was as option to make all the offsets from marked objects the same.
    In X15, there is a chart which lists each dimension string offset and the ability to control each one.  I liked the old way better, is there an option in X15 to change all of the distance to the marked object at the same time?
    Thanks in advance.

    Lane

  3. Is anyone familiar with the New York Stretch Energy Code?  I know it has requirements for window and door U values, hook up for electric vehicle charging, increased insulation requirements, but what else?

    Thanks in advance,

    Lane

  4. This plan has two different floor elevations, but the top plate elevations should be the same.

    One floor is 16" higher than the other.  The ceiling height in this floor is 97-1/8".

    The lower floor ceiling height is 113-1/8" (97-1/8"+16").  Everything shows up correctly in

    the structure dialog box, but when I do a cross section the floor elevations are correct but the top plate heights are different.

    How do I correct this before I put the roof on this building?

    Zip file attached.

    I am using X15.

     

    Thanks in advance,

    Lane

    12-10-2023 Revised Floor Plan.zip

  5. On 11/24/2023 at 3:02 PM, Kbird1 said:

     

    As Rob mentioned that won't change any Existing Windows in the Plan Labels you will need to group select them and switch them to "relative" too. New windows placed should follow the new Default though.

     

    Personally i have not seen 1 1/4" plates used.....

     

    M.

    The plates are ordinary 2x6 PT run through a planer so the tops of the new joists align with the tops of the existing ones.  The concrete contractor matches the existing foundation height for the foundation wall, then the framer makes the adjustment to the sill plate height.

  6. I want to change the orientation of the window labels so they are parallel, not perpendicular to the Windows. This occurs where the windows are on the sides of the building running top to bottom.  The windows running left to right are aligned properly.  I tried to change the angle in the Window Schedule Label dialogue, but nothing changes.
    Next, is there a way to control the height of the sill plate for a given section of foundation wall?  I have a continuous wall and in one section the span will call for I joists.  The other sections of the wall call for 2x10.  The 2x10 are actually 9-1/4" tall, while the I joists are 9-1/2" tall, so I want to use a 1-1/4" thick plate where the I joists will go. Do I need to create a new wall for that section?
    Using X15

    Thanks,
    Lane

  7. 5 hours ago, GeneDavis said:

    What's that other program, @Ed_Orum

    I would rather not say because I do not want to give the impression (maybe I already have) that it is superior to Chief.  I actually use two other programs, depending on which Architect or Engineer I am working for at the time. Chief makes me more money than the other programs, but it also gives me more agita.
    Happy Thanksgiving.
    Lane

  8. 4 hours ago, robdyck said:

    @Ed_OrumHi  Ed, while we all need to work in the most efficient manner for our own skill sets, I can tell you that Chief is remarkable for all aspects of residential design. I NEVER use a cad detail for exterior elevation views and 99% of the time I don't have a single errant line produced in those views. In other words, Chief is producing the drawing and the model perfectly!

    That being said, I have over 20 years of experience with Chief! I also use almost no CAD drawing or detailing in plan view. 

    If you wanted to find improvements within Chief, you could frequently contact Tech Support with a specific issue or immerse yourself in the Help section. Better yet would be to hire a mentor who could virtually meet with you and show you exactly how to address a specific issue. I can tell you that to learn the software, (a very long time ago) I have read several versions of the manual cover to cover .After 20+ years, I still refer to Help and watch Chief's videos to refresh my skills and look for pointers or methods that I may have forgotten, overlooked, or rarely used. If you're ever interested in some assistance, I'd be happy to discuss what you need and how I could help.

    Well you are a better man than me.  Elevation views are always popping up errant lines, missing something here or there.  Having said that, when I called Tech Support I was told they only help with issues concerning the products performance, like if the program is not working properly, they are not there to help with teaching how to perform operations in ther program.  I do a lot of CAD details, I probably have at least 500 I have drawn for different municipalities here in New York, some for CT, and some for PA.  Chief does a great job in that respect.  I can do a section view in Chief, convert it to a CAD Detail, then annotate it and correct whatever Chief left undone or done incorrectly.  Chief is probably the best when it comes to CAD Details and annotating them.
    But, I use it because for simple drawings, it is a good money maker.  I have done pretty well with it over the years and have learned a lot of my own workarounds. Nothing is perfect, so I will continue to use it.  However I am not sure I could encourage anyone who is starting out in residential blueprints (and some light commercial) to go with Chief.  I think Revit would be a better choice. 
    In the final analysis, I have to keep in mind that some of my problems with Chief can certainly be because I do not fully understand the program and how it functions, in spite of using it for over 20 years.  So I need to take some of the blame too.