GeneDavis

Here are two details that represent how we will build.  Taken together, one can see how the floor slab sits within the foundation when the walls above the slab are ICF, and atop the foundation wall when the wall above the slab is wood-framed.

I can model the stepping.  Thanks to Bill Page for reminding me to do the lower floor not as Floor 0 Foundation, but to make that floor Floor 1 and do the part-foundation below it (the stepped down frostwalls) in Floor 0.

But now that it can be modeled in 3D, sort of, there still exists two problems.

1.  How to get a foundation drawing to layout, in that part of it is on Floor 0 and part on Floor 1.

2.  How to dismember the floor slab so it places both inside foundation wall and atop foundation wall, where needed.

It ain't Texas, David. Us mere mortals do foundation design in vast parts of the north country.

A walkout basement design in a winter climate is a hybrid affair, isn't it?

The front of the house, the uphill side, has a foundation under, while the rear, the walkout side, has its lower exterior walls built atop the basement slab, which is brought to bear upon the frost-wall foundation below.  

So that basement slab is part inside the walls and part outside.

I built a model for a friend that wants to build such a house, and floor 1 is the main or upper floor.  The foundation floor under has the out-of-ground exposed walls as wood framed, while the buried walls, in this case, are 11" ICF.

What is my best route to getting the frost walls built in Chief, and getting that basement slab modeled accurately?

Two words.  Material and region.

This has been discussed before.  Those reveals should be easy to do.

We get them now, but by "get" I mean we can specify them and when doing so, the material list includes them.  No build in 3D, though.

If Chief were to build them in 3D for us, what would be the best and most comprehensive way to have all the options?

Height for sure.

Width as a plus-one-side dimension regarding casing build.  IOW, if the total casing build width is 4-1/4", and we specify 1/8" plus for the plinth, the plinth width will be 4.25+0.125+0.125 = 4.5

Chamfered edges and top edges.  Round-over edges and top edges.

What else?

Or you choose a stone that has a pattern.

Thanks, Glenn.  If there was an option one could check for the millwork feature that would put it IN the casing at top center, one could use this.

I think I will post this in the Suggestions area.

Looking at that earlier thread about Chief vs Softplan and the test-bed house with its stucco trims, I got to wondering.

There is no semi-hidden feature I've missed in windows spec dialog, is there, that yields top-centered keystones?

Would such a feature be useful, or are p'solids just as easy for doing these?

You need to make a mental leap and accept what Chief can do for cabinet work, or else move on.  

Chief Architect has some excellent samples of kitchen work, and here is one.  http://cloud.chiefarchitect.com/1/pdf/plan-sets/Fire-Ice-Kitchen.pdf

Look at that, and tell us what you need that it does not have.

Tech support got the same results as I did, after I submitted a ticket.  I'll wait to hear further.

This plan has a wall type used both in a single-type (non-pony) wall, and in pony walls.  Stone-6 is the name of the wall type.

When I do a material region in it drawn single-type, the material region will embed.  Not so if it is part of a pony wall.

If I start a brand new plan and do the same, the material regions embed.

Try it in my plan and see, and tell me what you think is going on.  Thanks.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/17835038/Westfall%201250%207_pitch%20roof.plan

All I wanted was the ability to specify rims separately from joists, and we've got that.

Show us your plan.  Heh.

Crickets are also used for the situation shown here.  I x-scrubbed away the roof above and some soffit so you can see it.  Any little roof doodle that is done, usually atop a roof already sheathed, to get the water away and not cause problems, is a cricket.

Wonder where the term originated.

Not automatically.  You will need to learn how to manually draw roofs.  It is a very worthwhile exercise.  Chief gives you total control.

This one has the pitch at 4:12, except for the ones that make the level ridge.

I'm outta answers.

See my edited post above.

If that is a level ridge coming out from the house, centered on the bay feature bump within the porch, there must be a cricket in there that we cannot see.

There is snow and shadow in the way.

Your Chief model only shows us what you tried to do to duplicate it.  We need better photos of the as-built.  Are you able to better examine all those elements of the porch roof, and measure pitch of each?

Is there something like this going on?

Material region tool works, whether joints are recessed or proud.  Very useful tool.

Multiple copy makes doing an array easy.  Things like this, board and batten, and more, all now possible for good looking 3D.

V10 seems so long ago.  It may have shown floor structure and ceiling structure in simple diaphragm format, when doing a section.  Lines of the outer envelope.

We got to add more detail to structure as releases came out, thus your issue.  We now don't get the diaphragm bounds, instead, we get all the details of frame and finish.

So why not just settle for some CAD boxes and call it a wrap, if you want that old look?  I am kind of surprised a cabinet specialist like you would not want the wall elevation instead.

In that case, draw the wall and move it under the stairs.

Sure is a pretty staircase.  Looks like mahogany.  I like the way the first few steps flare with their curves.  To reproduce, get a good stairbuilder, and get out your wallet.

Looking for advice on how to model this using all-Chief, with precision, to match the real thing?

Your attempt shows your stairs curving at the bottom, which is not what is happening in the photo.  Your stairs take a flare on one side, with treads and risers going from rectangular (tread #6 from bottom, it appears) to being arc segments as you go down 5-4-3-2 to the first tread at 1.  Your wall-under-stair follows that nicely-done flare.

Consider modeling a sequence of landings for numbers 1 through 5, with appropriate curved shapes in 2D plan, then springing your straight run up from #5.

Chief's stair tools are a little lacking when it comes to doing a stair with this geometry.  Getting that railing with its curve, rollout, and bottom newel will take some work.  Your skirt is going to take some work, and may need to be modeled outside Chief, then imported as a symbol.

Good luck.  Here are a couple pics of stairs like yours, but not as nice.  Whoever did yours had a great eye.

I am going blind looking for this in the window spec dialog.  Used to be able to get a cottage style look.

How, in X6?

Edit.  Got it. Sorry.

Thanks, Glenn.  Problem solved!

Not sure what I did, but here is the file.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/17835038/Westfall%201250%207_pitch%20roof.plan

Started out with all sheetrock-surface walls set to material = drywall, and then wanted to paint the inside.  Ended up with a spec getting into ROOM SPEC  > MATERIALS > WALLS that I did not really want, and somehow, it has affected my ability to get a fireplace wall (stone faced) to show in 3D as stone faced.

Materials, the painter, and the rainbow tool are all mysteries to me.

How is that default set for room walls materials, and how is it reset to the default?

Very kewl.

What did you use for modeling the newel?

This one is a wonderful display of what can be done with the molding tool.  Stacking up the cables, each with its offset and height done to follow the curve, is a great way of using the Chief tool.