HamlinBC

Members
  • Posts

    481
  • Joined

Posts posted by HamlinBC

  1. We have 2 - HP Designjet T120's that we print all bidding and final plans on.  We don't send anything to print shops.

     

    We even print on a "TyVek" style paper that is waterproof and won't tear.  Contractors prefer it over laminating their plans as they can still write on it with pencil.

     

    For 11x17's we have bigger multifunction (Kyocera TASKalfa 3050ci/3051ci) devices that we use.  They also print in color...which I LOOOOVE.

  2. +1 on what everyone else has said.

     

    I always felt the same about not having time, but you know what...you use it here and there try out some of the new features and keep rolling.  If you find a bug, great, if not, well at least you know it works well in what you do.

     

    Personally, I would use the Beta for production if I was a one man outfit, but since we have around 10 users here I can't really be cranking out stuff that others can't look at.

     

    The 3DConnexion support alone is enough to make me want to keep using it, buuuuut...*sigh*

  3. Just the plain 'ol rendering only utilizes 8 lights per room...so the other 64 lights are not used.

     

    In RAYTRACING you can have 64 lights and it gathers data from all of them.  That's why a common solution to slow raytracing is to eliminate lights in other rooms that don't directly affect the scene.  Because the software is trying to compute those lights for no reason...

     

    Again...see attached.

    post-237-0-19385500-1449694554_thumb.jpg

    post-237-0-40223800-1449694559_thumb.jpg

  4. https://chieftalk.chiefarchitect.com/index.php?/topic/7401-construction-of-home-inside-pole-barn-do-we-start-with-walls-or-bare-framing/

     

    My last post there shows that you can use general framing members to create the poles and the purlins.  This method would still work even if your purlins are flush to the outside of the poles...you just have more framing members to draw, which isn't hard to duplicate with Ctrl+C, Ctrl+Alt+V, and then pt-pt move them to the next bay.

     

    I've tried getting the material and editing all the defaults to get it to auto build correctly, and in the end a polebarn is easier to manually draw to get it exact.

  5. Problems......  I was attempting to get the base level of my girts in a separate layer as all my replicates so if I need to change spacing, I can do that.  So....  Is there either a way to edit the replication specs or a way to get my replicas to show up in another layer?  So far I have found no way to either go back and edit my spacings or get the replicas in another layer so if I need to change something, I get to delete about 100 pieces of lumber and start over. 

     

    Don't delete the existing purlins...

     

    Just pull open a 3D view and Shift+Select a bunch of purlins.  Then use the open command (see 1.png) to open the group.  Go to "Line Style" and change them all to your layer of choice (see 2.png).

     

    It's fairly straight forward, you just have to get your mind out of CAM mode and into Chief mode...

     

    I also added a rough plan file that has some framing for a pole barn on it...so you can compare.

    post-237-0-48151500-1449531284_thumb.png

    post-237-0-35407800-1449531290_thumb.png

    Polebarn.plan

  6. Not really...

     

    I was going to suggest using multiple light sources, but you're pretty much limited to 8, and you'd need probably 2-3 times that many in order to get it to look right.

     

    I suppose you might be able to somewhat swing it with using 2 spot lights and set their cutoff angle to 170...and then use a p-line solid with an emissive material to fake the lightbar.

     

    See attached...

    post-237-0-06136200-1449097015_thumb.png

    post-237-0-86109100-1449097028_thumb.png

    post-237-0-39775500-1449097036_thumb.png

    post-237-0-84523400-1449097041_thumb.jpg

  7. I don't like that "stretch to fit" has to be selected in order for the Global Symbol Mapping to work.  In the end, it doesn't look right because the pattern just repeats and it doesn't give the desired result.

  8. Here's what I did:

     

    1. Make the cabinet out of 4 boxes instead of 8...just to simplify things.
    2. Selected my material I wanted to use for the door fronts.
    3. Made the scale of the material to be the width of the cabinet (in my case 96").
    4. Make 4 copies of the material so I now have 4 UNIQUE materials (which is technically all the same material), and assign each unique material to each cabinet door.
    5. Offset each copy the width of each cabinet (in my case 24").

    Kind of hard to understand by explaining through text...so maybe I'll make a video sometime.

     

    Either way attached is the plan of the cabinet, so feel free and look at it.

    post-237-0-88233800-1449005637_thumb.jpg

    Untitled 3.plan

    • Upvote 1