Michael_Gia

Members
  • Posts

    1165
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Michael_Gia

  1. 25 minutes ago, SNestor said:

    I did this automatically. No frustration required :)

    The trick is to create a specific wall type for your porches...and then on the "wall properties" tab, specify an offset on the foundation. In this example I specified 1.5". Now...I'm not saying all is perfect when it comes to Chief a Porches and railing walls. I made the beam wide in order for the "frieze" to meet the beam. If you offset the wall...well, the frieze only extends to the face of the wall. But..the foundation part is fairly simple. 

     

    No need for an invisible layer either. 

     

    2023-12-06_13-43-55.thumb.png.117923d249d25b6a02cbd252207693b6.png 2023-12-06_13-48-15.thumb.png.7d32d0bca3d593e76d3028774250b31e.png2023-12-06_13-50-25.thumb.png.72c144567d213b8c63238ff9af2d8d64.png

    Let’s see AutoCAD do that, bucko!

     

    (speaking to OP). 
     

    The best thing about setting up your walls for the balcony the way you described is that you can redraw your balcony a million times and everything follows. 

     

    If this is your template then all future plans will be as automated with that initial very small setup procedure. 
     

    In Chief there is sometimes a little more work to figure this out and setup but in the long run it’s way more efficient than most other software of this type. 

  2. 2 hours ago, ChiefChrissy said:

    How can I get the wood plank floor material pattern to be visible in my finish plan?   The material is correct in 3d view and in the room specification dialog box but I want it to show up on the floor plan view.   

    You can set a fill pattern in plan view as DBCooper mentioned.

    I usually use these settings...

    image.thumb.png.da2f9b1b4c768ff9bed558eb1c4a264f.png

     

    To get this effect for wood flooring...

    image.thumb.png.4923730aa41fedccc940a8e4d6f2f2a9.png

    the background color is Mocha with 80% transparency.

     

  3. 2 hours ago, decorators3 said:

    Do I really need exterior software ???

    The short answer is, definitely not. 
     

    I use Twinmotion because it is easier to add landscaping, trees bushes etc. 

     

    It’s also easier to create several images and especially video walkthroughs in TwinMotion. Much easier, actually. 
     

    But you don’t need it. Another point is that Twinmotion is free and easy to learn albeit with a very foreign interface for a Chief user. 

    • Upvote 1
  4. 4 hours ago, Renerabbitt said:

    You can do alright with regular pbr. Needs a lil post processing though, a filter and some fake ies lights
    583479439_examplerender.thumb.jpg.513544093283be0e5aa6527b3b33b039.jpg

    That’s incredible. Do you mind if I use that?
     

    I’m assuming you couldn’t get clear glass either? With regular pbr, that is?
    You used the window as a mask for that outside image? (Photoshop)
     

    great work. I need to put more time into photoshop. I’m sure with your level of skill that was a 10 minute PS job, am I right?

  5. 1 hour ago, Chrisb222 said:

     

    That refers to the memory on a standalone graphics card. Since newer Macs like yours use integrated video that shares memory with the CPU, there is no onboard graphics card hence no memory on the non-existent graphics card.

    Thank you Chris!

     

    I will follow your tips on adding interior lights and adjusting outside sun.

     

    I usually use Raytrace but I was hoping on using PBR when zooming around with clients in 3D.

     

    been an ssa user since X6 and still struggle with a few things.

  6. 1 hour ago, Greg_NY61 said:

    In settings Uncheck Opaque Window Glass and that should solve that

    Capture2.thumb.JPG.528d2a18ebac78ad2b5a946aaa6351e7.JPGCapture1.thumb.JPG.f5783a6e1983378f42801475ec808c88.JPG277268522_Untitled1.thumb.jpg.b4db31d6984f5b306c3679bb53677b54.jpg

    I have Opaque Windows unchecked. 
     

    I know it looks like it’s checked.  That’s why I’m sure it’s something minor tha I am missing. 
     

    The glass is clear in Standard render, but milky in PBR. 

  7. 2 hours ago, Doug_N said:

    Rene and Alan are probably away ahead of me, but that kind of looks like glare, and that the external lighting (daylight) is set way too high.  Try reducing the sun intensity for a start as Alan is indicating in his render settings.

    I reduced the daylight quite a bit and that did help but I'm still getting the fogginess. 

     

    Anyone know why Preferences is showing 0MB for video memory?

     

    image.thumb.png.f4f4c959f27f36253d00d18ff4ce6b36.png

  8. 10 minutes ago, Renerabbitt said:

    ah okay...this largely has to do with the material properties of the flooring. You could do well with a material that has some movement in the roughness map to breack that up

    Ah ok, thanks. 
     

    The floor material is from the modern contemporary style palette. 
    I assumed those materials would be fine tuned for pbr? 

  9. On 11/19/2023 at 8:50 AM, HFreed said:

    Trying to decide whether or not to upgrade my current MBP and would love any feedback if you've used x15 on the new MacBook M3 (Pro) chip. I'm particularly interested in how PBR is looking. Thanks! 

    I got the M3 now. 
     

    I haven’t done any extensive testing yet but so far any saved pbr views I have in plans look exactly as bad as they did in my previous intel MacBook Pro only they are faster and easier to move around in 3D with virtually no lag. I can now use pbr like standard render mode. 
     

    now, if only I knew how to make any pbr look good, that would be great. 
     

    My main problem in pbr on a Mac has always been this weird foggy halo coming in from the windows as if the windows have a white film on them. 

    • Like 3
  10. On 10/8/2023 at 12:14 PM, dmbarbee said:

    I am using version 15 of Chief Architect and making a building that requires a flat roof. On top of that roof, I want to do a rooftop deck. However my priority is the flat roof. Any advice on how to construct it?

     

     

    Just build another floor.

     

    The exterior walls of that new floor will be the parapet walls.

     

    To adjust the height of the parapet walls to say, 32" you need to set the ceiling height of that "room" to 32".  Of course, the room being the roof in this case.

     

    Use a wall cap to show the parapet flashing.

     

    Change the finish of the floor to asphalt, or membrane of whatever.

     

    Your floor structure is now your roof trusses.

     

    You get the idea?

     

    You can now build whatever structure on top by defining a room. (don't forget to adjust the ceiling height in that room to something normal)

     

    You can also add a roof plane on top of that room. etc. etc...

    • Upvote 1
  11. 2 hours ago, HumbleChief said:

    Need to get the floor levels correct

    I find X15 randomly change floor elevation in some rooms. I keep having to go in a few times and set floor level to default. 
     

    Question, why would you build framing if you’re still trying to get your floor levels correct? 
     

    As René, mentioned, do you have an image or pdf of the levels you’re trying to mimic?

     

    Very cool design by the way, looks like a nightmare… lol 

  12. 22 hours ago, Planstech said:

    upgrade to X15, or move to Revit

    Limitations in Revit Lt.

     

    No model-in-place families.

    No view filters. (compare to Chief's Plan Views - no competition)

    No collaboration

    Limited editing for roofs and floors, etc...

    Also NO plug-ins. So forget about easily customizable cabinets, etc.

     

    I don't think LT is in the same category as Chief X15, not by a long shot.

     

    (I can't believe it.  I'm starting to sound like a Chief fanboy)

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
  13. 45 minutes ago, DeLayDesign said:

    Chief insists on limits on constructability - which makes me question on a regular basis - why?

     

    I understand your frustration and I used to think the same way.  

     

    Until I made a temporary switch to Archicad, and that was after trying out Revit and VectorWorks, and keep in mind that I originally switched to Chief from many years with SoftPlan.

     

    If your work is mainly residential stick construction and you mainly produce construction documents for permit that require you to get approvals from your clients based on visuals from a 3D model, then I'm afraid to inform you that nothing compares to Chief...as much as I hate saying it.

     

    I'll give a small snippet of a limitation in Archicad for you to appreciate Chief's automated Room Definition approach.  So, if you Place a garage door and that door cuts into both the main floor wall and the foundation, then Archicad will only cut a hole in the wall you place the door.  You will then have to go down to the foundation wall and cut a whole for the garage door.

    And guess what happens when you move that door left of right?  You guessed it, you have to adjust the hole in the foundation. 

     

    Nothing is perfect but Chief is specifically designed for a very particular segment of the design-build industry.

    All you have to do is determine if you are in that group.  If you are stay with Chief, otherwise you will spend a lot of money and time to come full circle back to Chief.

     

     

    • Like 4
    • Upvote 1
  14. 1 hour ago, mmebsc said:

    oops, Sorry. Forgot to add the file. B) this one has data in it 

     

    I'll give your solution a try. Thank you.

     

     

    Chief Architect X13

    Windows 10 Pro

    Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v4 @ 3.60GHz   3.60 GHz

    Parkroy Concept 1.zip 2.33 MB · 0 downloads

     

    The reason the program is changing your material is that it’s reverting to the wall’s “default material”.

     

    Click on the wall and open its dbx. 
    Go to “wall type” tab and click on the “define” button. 
    Change the siding material that you want for this plan. The program’s default material for this wall type is now changed for this plan. 

    Precautionary step: while still in the wall’s dbx go back to the “materials” tab. 
    Verify that the “Exterior Wall Surface” says “Default: __________” next to it. 
    If it doesn’t, click “Select Material”, select the “Plan Materials”, scroll to the top of the list and select “Use Default”.

     

     

  15. 23 hours ago, moreauj said:

    I need to create terrain slope in x and y directions simultaneously, i.e;


    Not easy to do since Chief is always trying to “smooth” out the different elevation regions.

     

    If you’re trying to create an idealized terrain to show slopes in the various elevations and 3d view, then what I often do is to use 3D solids and 3D mouldings to create the terrain. (A very geometric but precise terrain)
     

    This way I can precisely create the slopes in cross sections and then convert the shapes into 3D solids and adjust these objects in plan view to create the slope away from the building and simultaneously create the water drainage slope from the back of the property to the street. 
    After you create all theses various wedges and pyramid type shapes you can join then all into one object. 
     

    The downside is that Chief won’t recognize the resulting 3D solid/terrain as a true terrain.
    So, when you want to place trees, shrubs, fences, etc., the objects won’t snap/gravitate to the terrain. 
     

    What I do is, export the model to Twinmotion which does allow for placing of objects on my “terrain”.

    That is where I do the landscaping stuff anyway in my models.  

     

  16. 9 hours ago, Chopsaw said:

    The "Eave Sub Fascia" is what the Soffit attaches to so it must be less than the "Eave Fascia"

    I always make it 1 inch less. 
    That seems to work. 
     

    Although this dialogue box is one of the world's great unsolved mysteries. 
     

    Thankfully Chief’s auto roof gets things mostly right, otherwise I’d still be working on my first plan. 

  17. 4 hours ago, LevisL said:

    I'm running a 14" MacBook Pro with the M2 Max chip

    Why not the 16”?

     

    I’m looking at getting the 16” model only because that’s what I have now. 
    Like you, I hav it hooked up to an external monitor. 
    I rarely do actual work on the laptop without the external monitor. 
    The laptop alone is mainly to take on site and show stuff, or to suppliers when clients are choosing stuff. 
     

    I’m just worried I’ll miss the slightly larger screen on those occasions. 
    I would like the savings, though.