DavidJames

Members
  • Posts

    321
  • Joined

Posts posted by DavidJames

  1. Viki, if your tech is attempting to charge you $1700 for a clean install + software installation, you need to find yourself a new tech as that's a monumental ripoff. 

    That being said, for a computer that's 7-8 years old, I don't think I would even spend $500 on something that may end up not even fixing the issues you are having

    In my opinion, based on the age of your current PC, I'd say you're overdue for a new system. Keep your video card and your hard drive though :).

  2. 14 hours ago, Handwerk_Arts said:

    Okay, I think you have me convinced to stay with Intel. Especially after looking at the benchmarks. It is matching some processors that are four times the price.
    Only one problem: Tracking down an I7 8700K is like trying to find the elusive Jackalope. They may indeed exist, but thanks to underproduction, they are nowhere to be found. Motherboards to match, are almost as troublesome. Especially if i am aiming for one that supports  m.2 drives and quad channel ram.


    Much like yourself, I was planning on upgrading to a Ryzen system as well. I was debating between the 1800x and the 7820x for months. I ultimately went with the 7820x because it essentially provided single threaded performance close to the 7700k (single-threaded king), and multi-threaded performance meeting/exceeding the 6950x (10 core, $1700, beast of a chip).

    The Ryzen chips are great, don't get me wrong; they really shine with multi-threaded performance but unfortunately fall behind when it comes to single-threaded performance by quite a large margin. Some of the software I use benefits from ST, and some of the software I use benefits MT so to me the 7820x ended up being the better option. 

    As TheKitchenAbode has said, the 8700k should be a great option for you. Keep in mind that the 8700k, much like the 1700x/1800x, only supports dual-channel memory. Is there much of a difference between dual/quad channel? Depending on the software it can double your memory bandwidth, or it can have absolutely no benefit whatsoever.

    Here's a comparison between your current chip and the 8700k: 

    http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-8700K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-2400/3937vs803

  3. Quote

    Although chief is written for multi core rendering the improvements are marginal when stacked against a fast single thread(I have both)...and single threaded speed helps for all other tasks that chief handles. A big recommendation from a former computer builder..make sure your motherboard supports m.2 drives and quad channel ram.


    I ended up going with a 7820x + 32GB of Quad Channel ram for this exact reason. Built the system just yesterday. 

  4. I'm really confused as to what you're after buuuut... 

    Couldn't you just do a copy-in-place and then reflect-about the copy?

    That way you have the original version remaining, plus the reflected version as well?

     

  5. Unfortunately CA does not possess the capability to import Revit files. 

    The file itself would need to be exported/converted into a format that CA can import (dwg, dxf, sketchup etc...)

     

  6. Interesting. 

    Are you able to provide some samples? I'd love to see the end result. 

     

    2 hours ago, glennw said:

    I have used Wall Material Regions to do this type of cladding before.

    Michaels tip of hiding the MR layer solves the problems that MR have at the corners.

     

    I have done something similar, but instead of turning the MR layer off, I have used a "Gap" material type to hide the MR and clean up the corners

     

  7.  

    9 minutes ago, yusuf-333 said:

    Material regions are not good at corners, applying cladding material directly on wall would give that look in IMO.

    clading.jpg


    Very true. 

    Also, when it comes time to applying color, I'm thinking having separate panels would look a lot better as each will have it's own gradient/shading etc. 

  8. I personally don't think it's an issue setting up a PayPal account where users can donate money for your hard work in regards to the symbols you've created. 

    Furthermore, there are threads within this forum where people are selling macros that they've spent the time to create to make our lives easier when it comes to drawings and calcs... I fail to see how this would be any different. That being said, you could also create your own thread showcasing all your symbols, some of them free, some of them with a price tag. 

    My time is valuable so, if I can find a symbol out there that I need, 10 times out of 10 I'll purchase it rather than spend hours and hours trying to create it.