country

Members
  • Posts

    675
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by country

  1. As I said, Chief probably works well for many people using auto deck framing. I have never done a patio cover. My decks either have a full roof or none and these require different supports because of frost and snow loads. Piles vaying from 12' to 16' deep and various diameters make auto impossible. The lower posts in Chief never line up with the uppers (which is necessary for load transfer) and I just find it easier/more accurate to do it manually. Copy and paste in place and multiple copy are auto enough for me.

    Just different needs not a criticism.

  2. I only use the post to beam for quick design visuals, after that I do it the same as Scott. If there are revisions, which there always are, you don't have to rebuild the decks and fix their supports every time. Just select and move the structural elements as a group or individually to suit. Deck framing the way Chief does it is not the way it's done anywhere I have designed but it may suit some areas. Automation can only suit so many areas/design situations.

  3. This is for Sherry just in case you missed something while you were off-line and Alan and Antoine and anyone else that missed the meeting or would like to see it again. This video file is 1:46 long and 805 MB mp4 so watch it now on OneDrive but if you would like to maybe watch it again later please download it and save a copy for yourself as it may not be available forever like when I run out of cloud storage space. Thanks again for hosting Scott. Thanks also to Scott Harris for participating.

    attachicon.gifVideo.JPG https://1drv.ms/v/s!AjjmuSMVEle6hG3yysOBUg7vRyOi

    P.S. There is one audio track missing from the video but it is only mine and I did not have much input. I think I can fix this for the next video.

    Thanks so much for this. I will be able to go back and review all the things I missed because I couldn't take notes.

  4. Quite a few years ago, the Architects in B.C. tried to shut down the home designers. There was quite a bit of tension and negotiation but it didn't happen. I didn't get too involved and then moved to another province but it would be interesting to hear from anyone there that was actively involved in the issue.

    I worked for an Engineer for quite a while doing all the structural details and corrections for many architects and designers plans. This was a great education and I can honestly say there were good, bad and ugly in both camps both in style and ability.

  5. As an Interior Designer, I'm sure you will be doing lots of structural changes (such as your dormer) or additions and those can only be done properly with the pro version. Chief has a payment plan and you get the purchase price of your current program taken off of the total cost. I'm sure Sales could work something out for you. As Scott said, your time is valuable. As you can see, people on this forum will also be a valuable asset if you are using the full version.

  6. Johnny, I also use a lot of material regions and wish we could use the component join tool at the corners, with them, just as with all the other wall types. Auto join would be even better. I'll send it into suggestions once again, hopefully others will too.

  7. I seem to be getting more commercial job inquiries. Most of them are from previous home plan clients or referral from them. I used to turn them all down but have now started to agree to preliminary design work as long as they know it has to go to an architect and engineer for the code review work and structure. Once the design and presentation work is complete I hand it off to the client or one of the firms I work with. I do not do any work on the plans after that as they are beyond my scope of practice as stated in the NBCC.

    Any architect I know will only stamp their own drawings produced by their office but engineers usually will stamp residential plans with their details and notes added.

  8. Building Architects -  Your degree has failed you if you waste time answering questions like the OP. You should be out practicing engineering where your license is of value, not here on CA.Building Science s/b your primary subject matter and how CA applies as one of your tools. 

     

    OP, drafters knowledge base, capacity, and scope of work if VERY limited and NO Way includes FEM, not even remotely close, IF you know what you are doing!

    Terry. What, may I ask, has this to do with the OPs question? After all of the help you have received from this forum, from people you seem to think are limited in education and obsolete, I would think you could be a bit more courteous. I appreciate everyone that helps me out here, architects, engineers and many, many drafts people/designers. Knowledge is not limited to formal education.

    • Upvote 2
  9. The majority of my custom homes are now using 84" doors with window headers at the same height, just as Joey mentioned. The price has come down and there is a lot more variety in styles now available in our market area.

  10. I am trying to have the dormers open through the ceiling plane but after trying numerous methods haven't been about to do it.  I cannot seem to generate a hole through the ceiling at the locations I require.

    This is currently just a design but will eventually have steel trusses.  I could just do a thick roof structure but I would rather do it correct for eventual framing.

    Barn.zip