BrownTiger

Members
  • Posts

    739
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BrownTiger

  1. Apologies if I state the obvious.. 

     

    I would not recommend using double click to open object specification dialog - if that is what you were using.  Select an object (such as a room) and use hotkeys:  Ctrl-E (windows) or Command E (mac).  

  2. Not sure what the issues are? 

     

    IMHO

    1) Neither plan have good dimension defaults. 

    2) Neither person understands how to provide / convey to a framer of what are you trying to get done, or dimensions.

    3) The casings may or may not be against the wall or may not always be flat, could have a different width or depth. They are not a good reference point.

     

    dims.thumb.PNG.e130378db100ca5274cb0b7a7af90262.PNG

     

    Whole 20 seconds. 

     

  3. This is my hobby.

     

    I rotated a plan few times but with Edit Area> All floors      for testing...  It looked weird.

    Some labels rotate, others do not. Not sure what construction worker would want blue prints rotated at 24 degrees... 

     

    I would build it straight and rotate one layout box on a like Site Overview page. IMHO. 

     

    Same if you are building on a large lot ... do not input entire survey dwg... Like 1 sq mile. Impossible to use and makes chief very slow.

    Import what you need for a house site. Merge on a layout page.

     

      

  4. Just my $.02. 

     

    The issue is not with the wallboard. Chief provides 4x12 and even 4.5x12, see below.

     

    I doubt any designer is using material list. It is not working correctly. So should you get a model 100% correct if you can not get totals anyway? 

     

    1) ChiefArchitect added Ruby macros ... very nice. I do not have a clue what get's passed to Ruby

     

    2) I created a simple Ruby macro "return1"

    that returns 1. Got an error,

     

    3) Jenna Video of 2 years old is wrong

    https://www.chiefarchitect.com/videos/watch/2438/using-formulas-in-materials-lists.html

     

    She adds extra 110% - that will cause total to be: count + extra = 210%. No one appears to complained.

     

    4) If CA wants to compute drywall as 4.75 per wall - fine show me that. 

    DO not show 5+5+5+5 = 19

     

    Even better let me round: count.ceil.

     

     

     

     

    Wallboard.PNG.069c764a48311eec12a20b46eb10f1ce.PNG

     

  5. Yeah, I probably should have used the term not the "Ruby Macros" [or read the help file to find out how CA calls these]

    IMHO (%schedule_number%) - probably simple old string substitutions thingies... eval("%%room.schedule_number%%") returns an error...

     

    No matter what Ruby macros work in a richtext box....

  6. 1 hour ago, rlackore said:

     

    To a certain extent, but the %schedule_number% macro doesn't work in Rich Text boxes, at least not for Rooms. I will make a Suggestion.

     

    That is because %schedule_number% is not a macro, and you are right it will never work.

    On the other hand if you do create a ruby macro:

    result=""

    result += owner.room.schedule_number + " - " + owner.room.name

    result

     

    It will work as a fake RichText room label

     

    MacroLabel.thumb.PNG.66198ef49034f11fe881c61ce74a6397.PNG

  7. Here are some benchmarks

    https://browser.geekbench.com/processor-benchmarks/

     

    RyZen AMD CPU are fine. They are fast and very decent CPUs and cost less than I9s.

     

    You may have an issue utilizing that many cores tho, If you have Ryzen9, as most software not designed to be heavily parallel.... I ran into an issues with Adobe PDF various libraries as the format was not designed for multithreading. This issue is applicable to the most software written today unfortunately.  

    • Like 1