After reading Scott's response, I am wondering about some things. I am certainly no software engineer, but I'm not sure I understand the "significant cost" of developing a hardware lock for future versions and requirement for staff resources. As he stated the hardware lock has been a part of CA since the 90's. Why does it require development now? What about it is there that requires so much staff time? Is there another solution to the hardware lock issue that could address the customers preferences for use of the program, and that gives them the convenience they require?
As I said, just wondering.
