En esta prueba vemos lo que indicaba. Me parece excelente el sistema de Chief (iluminación física) similar al que incluye blender (eevee).
Para concluir añado algunas observaciones sobre blender:
1. Es GPL y gratis.
2. No es un programa de CAD ni de arquitectura. Es similar a 3D Studio o Cinema4D.
3. A partir de la versión 2.8xx ha cambiado completamente.
4. Es complejo, similar a los mencionados antes.
5. Es abierto y muy potente (ampliable).
6. Incluye dos motores de renderizado: eevee (tiempo real) y cycles (raytrace) y admite muchos mas (libres y comerciales).
7. Tiene una comunidad de usuarios cada vez mayor (sin ellos no hubiera existido).
Y aunque uso Revit de forma asidua, siempre me ha gustado Chief, aunque necesita una característica, que aunque no es imprescindible, sí que es muy recomendable: el idioma. Tiene que traducirse si quiere salir de donde está. Parece un programa enfocado al mercado americano (y no sólo por el idioma). Por favor corregidme si me equivoco.
------------------------
In this test we see what it indicated. I find the Chief system (physical lighting) excellent similar to the one that includes blender (eevee).
To conclude I add some observations about blender:
1. It is GPL and free.
2. It is not an CAD or architecture program. It is similar to 3D Studio or Cinema4D.
3. From version 2.8xx it has completely changed.
4. It is complex, similar to those mentioned above.
5. It is open and very powerful (expandable).
6. Includes two rendering engines: eevee (real time) and cycles (raytrace) and supports many more (free and commercial).
7. It has a growing community of users (without them it would not have existed).
And although I use Revit regularly, I have always liked Chief, although he needs a feature that, although not essential, is highly recommended: the language. It has to be translated if you want to get out of where you are. It seems like a program focused on the American market (and not just because of the language). Please correct me if I'm wrong.