facer_03

Members
  • Posts

    204
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by facer_03

  1. BIMobjects - digitalisation of the building industry

     

    Gets interesting at 9 min mark of the video noted below.

     

     

    The digitalisation of our building industry - BIMobject® v2
    382 views Recommended for you
    Published on May 19, 2016

    hqdefault.jpg
     
     

    Description

    Stefan Larsson, founder & CEO of BIMobject®: The digitalisation of the building industry – a paradigm shift of massive proportions.

    Keynote answering the WHY, WHAT and HOW, this is what we believe in can change the world we all share and live in.

     

  2. BIM objects - integrated approach - launched Nov 2016

    - free service for designers

     

    BIM objects for download into Revit using combined services of:

    BIMobject (library of 3d products in Cloud) + Forge (Autodesk in the Cloud)

     


     

    =====================================================

    Check out:

     

    1. BIMobject (library of 3d products in Cloud in Revit, ArchiCad & SketchUp)


     

    2. Forge (Autodesk in the Cloud) Revit


     

     

    Process explained in youtube video:

    BIMobject® launches BIMsupply®, a Cloud-Based Supply Solution

     


    • Downvote 1
  3. Stereoscopic viewers:

     

    1. irisVR - Scope -  to become a paid version in November

    https://www.irisvr.com/scope

     

    https://www.irisvr.com/prospect - VR viewing using a headset linked to computer

     

    2. qrVR - 3D model viewing (and VR  viewing) - to become a paid version shortly

    They have an issue with lighting as you have to adjust for each scene.

    https://about.qrvr.io/

     

    3. Sketchfab - 3D model viewing (and VR  viewing) -  free version allows anyone to see your model,

    paid version gives control over who views model.

     

    Notes to Scott Harris:

    Your comment: The Chief Architect 3D Viewer is our current solution, what we have termed “VR without the headset”

    should be updated with the “VR without the headset” comment changed to something like "3D model viewing without the headset"

    VR is a completely different experience to viewing a 3D model on a screen and I assume Chief will eventually offer a similar option.

     

    Kylejmarsh comments on the complexity of using the current version of the 3D Viewer is a good insight

    into the "complexity" of using the 3D Viewer.  I assume Chief is aware of this and I look forward
    to the KISS Version (Keep It Simple Stupid - no disrespect intended)  The Viewer is a good first
    effort and I am sure will be improved with later versions.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    • Upvote 2
  4. VR software is undergoing exponential change that offers opportunities
    for Chief Architect users that produce quality 3D models.

    This is the first time I am aware of where fully detailed models
    such as those produced by Chief have an advantage over other software.

    The full impact of the VR viewing experience is at 1:1 scale as I discuss below.
    I have outlined my views on one excellent example that
    I personally experienced, I can recommend other Chief Architect users
    explore the new evolving VR Software.

    irisVR Prospect and iris Scope

    irisVR is an American startup based in New York
    that is producing impressive software for VR viewing.
    irisVR is excellent software for VR viewing that leapfrogs SketchFab and qrVR.

    The main software called Prospect is in Beta but functioning well.
    https://www.irisvr.com/prospect
    It can be used now for free. Note the required computer specifications for
    operating the software is high.

    Try a Test Run at your VR Gaming Parlour
    The VR viewers are expensive so I suggest contacting
    your local VR Gaming Parlour and see if you can use it there.
    If you are interested in what is the likely impact of VR
    on the practice of architecture focus on checking out
    irisVR Prospect.
    Definitely, view it in a VR Gaming Parlour with a
    minimum 3m x 3m x 2.7m height box set up.
    (see ThatVRJoint.com who are in Melbourne Australia noted below)

    irisVR Scope
    https://www.irisvr.com/scopeS
    Render stereo panoramas and upload them to your account.
    Log in to view and share VR panoramas on any compatible mobile device.
    Iris Scope works with both iOS and Android devices in the Google Cardboard.
    Many leading rendering engines support the Iris Scope format,
    including V-Ray and Octane Render.

    irisVR Prospect
    https://www.irisvr.com/prospect
    EXPLORE 3D MODELS IN VR
    Prospect installs plugins that enable you to send your files directly into VR.

    video for Prospect:
    IrisVR Prospect Features on HTC Vive & Oculus Rift



    My Views and experiences with Prospect.
    I have looked at a VR house model in a cardboard viewer
    and recently irisVR Prospect using HTC Vive goggles.
    The viewing cubicle was 4m x 4m x 3m ht.

    Courtesy of the "ThatVRJoint" in Melbourne I trialed the software.

    The VR cubicle was set for 1:1 scale so it appeared that I was actual in the kitchen and then
    the bathroom. It was as though I was in the real rooms of the house. The only clue that it was not real
    was the washed out effect of the walls and the pale colours and materials.

    However, the effect was truly amazing and I believe this phase in architectural visualization
    will be a "quantum" leap. This exponential change is only just beginning.
    I can not wait to see what the following months bring as the software is refined and improved.
    • Upvote 1
  5. Nice job with the sockets, well coordinated with Chief.

     

    A quick checklist of how you did it would be helpful for future reference

    for those not familiar with the process.

     

    If you could add "elect sockets - USB ports" or similar to the title it would help

    those outside of USA to know what the product is :)

     

    Thank you for the symbols!

  6. IFC - Data Standard – Industry Foundation Class (IFC)

     

    Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) BuildingSMART is all about the sharing of information between project team members

    and procurement, across the software applications that they commonly use for design, construction, maintenance and operations.

    Data interoperability is a key enabler to achieving the goal of a buildingSMART process.

    BuildingSMART has developed a common data schema (IFC) that makes it possible to hold and exchange relevant data between different software applications

     

    Reference:

    http://buildingsmart.org/standards/technical-vision/open-standards-101/

     

     

    5-basic-standards1.jpg

  7. BIM, what is it? (Building Information Modelling)
    NBS National BIM Library - UK
     
     
    106,188 views views
    Published on Oct 25, 2013

     


    Description

    This video helps with the question: 'What is BIM'?

    http://www.nationalBIMlibrary.com is the construction industry's free-to-use resource of NBS standard BIM content.
    Objects are available in IFC, ArchiCAD, Bentley, Revit and Vectoworks format.
    (note: although UK based it is FREE to enrol in NBS for BIM information and for BIM Library etc.  At present mainly IFC and revit files)

    NBS National BIM Library content links with manufacturer content such as maintenance literature and CPD. It also links to the UK specification system NBS.

    For more information on BIM please see http://www.thenbs.com/BIM

    For more information on BIM objects please see http://www.nationalbimlibrary.com
  8. Window Wall Structure Study - in 2 level timber frame

    timber frame - rafters TJI - glulam beams

     

    SketchUp model viewed with browser at:

    (refer to attached jpeg 2 - select icon to activate view of model in 3D in your browser)


     

    VR viewing of 3D model on phone with app or by using Google Chrome Browser at:

    https://qrvr.io/p/rolHjT - can view model till Oct 1 - 2016

     

    TJI roof that allows the use of two glulam beams with cantilevered rafters as shown in the model.

     

    Model and structural design by:

     

    Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE

    Medeek Engineering Inc

    design.medeek.com

    post-94-0-89336300-1471779506_thumb.jpg

    post-94-0-83016100-1471780119_thumb.jpg

    post-94-0-16197300-1471781688_thumb.jpg

  9. Paramount (Terry),

    The following is my attempt to assist you gain a better understanding of

    the design and construction industry.  It is meant to be a positive contribution.

     

     

    Apples and Oranges

    You are "re-inventing" the wheel when you refer building designers to "ANSI Y14.5" as a way to dimension 3D models.

    Dimensioning of 3D Models is adequately referenced within the design/construct industry.   (refer to Reference Links at the end)

     

    MBD/MDI is another word (or ancroynm) for BIM without direct links to the construction industry.

    Why is it necessary to re-invent what the design/construction world has been evolving for the past 25 years?

     

    BuildingSMART, formerly the International Alliance for Interoperability (IAI), is an international organisation

    which aims to improve the exchange of information between software applications used in the construction industry.

    It has developed Industry Foundation Classes (IFCs) as a neutral and open specification for Building Information Models (BIM).

     


     

    I would think you would get a better response and returns on your efforts for change in Chief by speaking in the language of the building and construction industry. 

    Hence why not use BIM which is fully established and linked to Design and Construction where MBD (MDI) applies to the auto/aero industries.

    Whatever lessons can be learned from the auto/aero industry should be referenced and integrated into the established design/construct nomenclature.

    (i.e. the body or system of names used in the design/construct industry)

     

    Chief Architect and BIM?.

    IFC (Industry Foundation Classes) is the key to integration between software.  I suggest this should be the

    focus for change by Chief users to allow it to evolve into the growing BIM environment.  Will Chief take up the challenge?

    Many Chiefers believe not, but I think it is a question of Chief's future success and survival. Why?

    The computer and technolgies now accelerating the uses of BIM are in an "EXPONENTIAL PHASE OF CHANGE". That is now the almost vertical line

    in the exponential graph! Within a few years we all will be using VR Goggles and looking at

    our Holigraphic slides and wonder how we ever did without them.

     

    If your CAD software does not allow IFC import/exports that can be read by other CAD programs then it will soon be "past its use by date".

    I do not believe that any new design or construction entrant will be using software that does not integrate with other software.

     

     

    Simlab

    Simlab is an interesting evolution of the use of 3D models but it appears to have a long way to go before it

    is fully integrated into the workhorse CAD programs as ArchiCad, Revit, AutoCAD etc.

     

    The integration with 3D pdf seems to be its strength but this is diminishing weekly as the new

    WebGL 3D Viewers as Sketchfab and qrVR improve with free entry levels.

     


    For me it is an all in one integration of SketchUp and Thea Render but at additional time and cost ($) to learn and use.

     

    A good example of the process using SimLab is:

    Exporting 3D PDF from Sketchup


    SimLab Soft

     

    I like the integration of the 3D pdf files with Adobe Reader and the ability to interegate the model but I am not sure

    how the building trades would respond to the process if dimensions etc are not clearly identified by 

    the designer. How will the documents be presented in any legal dispute?

     

    Chief Architects 3D Viewer assists the client or prospect understand the Model being designed.

    It is at present more of a visual aid to fully understand the Model. This can assist

    trades and subcontractors but does not add to the Documentation of the Construction Set

    where as 3D pdf's offer an alternative or complementary format.

     

    Reference Links for


    dimensioning and tolerances in the building industry

     

    dimensioning and tolerances in the building industry - USA


    Drawing and Drafting / Dimensioning and Tolerancing

     


    dimensional and tolerances in the building industry - USA



     

     

    Guide-to-Standards-and-Tolerances-2015 - Australia


     

  10. Paramount (Terry)

     

    What is the difference between BIM (Built Information Modelling)

     

    and your MBD (3D Model Based Definition)?

     

    You appear to be creating a variation of BIM, why?

     

     

    Suggestion.

    A lot of acronyms are used in the postings which is understandable given the topic.

    However it makes it difficult for a reader who has not read all the threads.

     

    I would suggest a "Table of Acronyms Used".

     

    Thought provoking thread 

    It is interesting to follow an "engineer's approach" to the design and construct industry.

    If anything you are giving the "Chiefers" another way of looking at how design and

    documentation could be approached.

     

    Thank you for your postings!

  11. Garage - Timber Trussed - 24 ft x 24 ft - conc slab

     

    Good reference for the layout and detailing of a timber frame - truss Garage by Medeek.

     

     

    3D Truss Model - View model at:

     

    https://qrvr.io/p/SoL7DG

     

    https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/model. ... 413304f620

    (select wheel icon for 3D View - see graphic pic attached)

     

    by Medeek » Tue Jul 12, 2016

     

    This is an example of a 24' x 24' garage that I would like to build on my property this summer or the next. 
     
    I created the foundation and roof with minimal effort using my own plugins. The walls were created initially with the housebuilder plugin however I then manually edited the walls. Note that the top plates overlap properly as they should.

    Also note that the garage door wall is a double portal frame. I would like for my wall plugin to automatically create this standard type of portal frame (PFH) both single and double (ie. Garage Door Option). Notice the embedded Simpson Strong-Tie STHD14 holdowns.

    I like to use 2x jamb boards around the door perimeters when the stem wall projects above the concrete slab, this may be atypical constructon for others. Local contractors like to embed a pressure treated nailer into the concrete.

    In theory I should be able to create this exact model using the Foundation, Wall and Truss Plugin and do it all within 5 minutes or less. That is the goal.

    With the wall plugin I will have the standard linear wall tool but I would also like to have a rectangle wall tool that will immediately throw up 4 walls given three user selected points, similar to the truss and roof plugins.
     
    Related details:
    Stemwall Foundation 5
    Garage - concrete sloping floor - house floor frame - timber
     
     
    Nathaniel P. Wilkerson PE
    Medeek Engineering Inc
    design.medeek.com

    post-94-0-34334000-1468304488_thumb.jpg

    post-94-0-84370100-1468328652_thumb.jpg

    post-94-0-40102300-1468334382_thumb.jpg

    • Upvote 1
  12. Thank you Graeme for your correction. Yes it is a private company that has evolved our of previous government structures.

    Part of their funding comes from the NZ government as noted in a paragraph from "About BRANZ".

    I will correct the main thread, anyone know how to change the title of this thread?

     

    Following was copied from the BRANZ website.

     

    ABOUT BRANZ

    How we are funded

    Funding for BRANZ comes from three main sources:

     

    • industry funding via the Building Research Levy
    • the Ministry of Science and Innovation
    • revenues generated through commercially contracted research projects for private, government and international clients.

     

    OUR HISTORY.

     

    We can trace our roots back into the 1950s as the Building Research Bureau, an industry-owned information service. In the late 1960s, the building and construction sector and the Government discussed the setting up of BRANZ, and Parliament passed the Building Research Levy Act in 1969. The Building Research Association of New Zealand Inc worked as an industry partnership with Government, similar to other research associations operating at that time. The Association was gifted the assets of the Bureau, and received on behalf of the sector the levy collected in accordance with the Act for investment in the development of knowledge for, and dissemination of knowledge to, the sector. Initially, the Government also provided an annual financial contribution, but this ceased in the late 1980s.

    In the early 2000s, the Board identified that there was scope for misunderstanding of the activities being carried out for ‘industry good' (and, through that, ‘public good') and commercial activities carried out for specific companies in the sector. In 2002, they created a separate company, BRANZ Ltd, which carried out all the research, advice, testing and education activities under the supervision of its own Board (which was appointed by the Association's Board) with a single CEO managing both entities.

    In 2004-05, the Board sought to strengthen the distinction between its role as investor of the Building Research Levy and the role of its subsidiary company BRANZ Ltd as an industry service provider, by appointing separate Chief Executives for the two entities. The Building Research Association of New Zealand Incorporated shortened its operational name to Building Research.

    In 2007, the Boards of Building Research and BRANZ Ltd jointly commissioned a review by PricewaterhouseCoopers of the effectiveness of the ‘funder-provider split', five years after it had been implemented. Their report recommended some improvements to the governance structures, which the Boards implemented. In 2008, the Boards of the two entities identified further synergies that would be secured by returning to having common governance, Board membership and one CEO, while explicitly retaining both the Association and BRANZ Ltd as legal entities with well-defined roles within BRANZ Group, and this revised and re-unified structure was implemented in mid-2008, culminating in the appointment of a BRANZ Group CEO on 1 September 2008.