kylejmarsh

Members
  • Posts

    377
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by kylejmarsh

  1. Sometimes you can bypass the Rescheck requirement by citing the code and going with the 'perscriptive' option which requires a certain minimum insulation/windows/etc. In michigan there's an option on the energy compliance sheet that you just check a box and you're good.

     

    If you have to do some exporting, I find (on a mac) that you can just export the 'thermal envelope data' and plug it into rescheck online version and it's pretty simple.

    • Upvote 2
  2. Can't believe I missed this so long ago but the Thermal Envelope data is a nice feature. Would be even better if it could be linked to a live schedule instead of an export.

     

    Anyway my question is how can we get a 'clean' export of the data? Right now it comes in with the units attached to the numbers in teh spreadsheet and that's a real PITA. Not a biggie but one of those 'I wonder why' things

     

     

    Screen Shot 2023-10-17 at 3.22.49 PM.png

  3. On 9/24/2015 at 7:51 PM, RodCole said:

    When setting up cross referenced cameras it compounds the work req'd for the cameras and call out numbering rather than being able to set them up and drag and rotate.

    Just set them up in your template off to the side and move them up when you want them. Then they're already set the way you want them, and already synced to your template layout file. Done and done. I have three for each direction:

     

     

    Screen Shot 2023-10-09 at 10.56.25 PM.png

  4. - B/W didn't help it

    - The former layout prints no problems (but it was from a while back so could be other issues)

     

    I ended up moving it over to a new layout file and prints just fine:

     

    238959673_ScreenShot2023-09-06at10_11_48AM.thumb.png.0c310357b3d94524dd4ce294d201263c.png

     

    Now here's the test: Turn on the watermark and what happens to the print? (save it first!)

     

    Looks like it works just fine...

     

    1907953925_ScreenShot2023-09-06at10_15_52AM.thumb.png.1c9cbdc3ff439fe85e96be4dfac2886e.png

  5. Having issues exporting a layout set where the file exports a blank looking pdf. However if you inspect the pdf a bit you'll see that the text is there, but everything is just white.

     

    Here is a pdf with the issue:

     

    Plans - Evangelista - Estimate Review - Sep 5.pdf

     

    It's a small file so I assume only the text is getting added to the pdf not the vectorwork or the live views.

     

    Also should know:

    - Other layout files plot just fine, it's just this one .layout

    - Relinking the model to a different one does not help

    - Sending it to printer instead of pdf creates a blank sheet

    - Previews in print dialog show as white

    - I had played around with adding a watermark to this layout, which is the only thing that is different than usual (from what I can tell)

     

    Any ideas on what could be going on?

     

    2112014672_ScreenShot2023-09-06at9_44_14AM.thumb.png.9d4243210989e334884826626defeb00.png

    Plans - Evangelista - Estimate Review - Sep 5.pdf

  6. On 9/17/2022 at 12:11 AM, Alaskan_Son said:

    Anyway, long story short, there are definitely a bunch of problems that need to be addressed. 

     

    One thing that should be addressed is that Chief should offer a standard 'Master List' with dang-near everything on there. Would be great if they hosted it on their website (with some kind of disclaimer obviously) and updated it every season or so. 

     

    Problem is that all framing should be already on there (beacuse we're not creating anything new like that) and a basic window, door, etc. etc... just a 'ballpark' type of Master List would be excellent because I could export it and give to the builders just for gut check type measurements.

     

    Maybe we should crowdsource a Master List together here at the forum. Would be a lot easier if we had all of us pricing things and adding them to a list than one of us chasing down prices for every part of our project like a General ...

  7. Here's how you can make some nice looking demo elevations with red dashed linework.

     

    Start with demo layer having the dashed + red linework style.

     

    Then go 3D to vector view - and try to turn off the 'color' of the wall textures. Problem is it turns off the linework red color too, which you want to preserve:

    478013894_ScreenShot2022-09-01at12_08_09PM.thumb.png.4908b163aa1cdc89bf574af2ff54a39a.png483804904_ScreenShot2022-09-01at12_08_18PM.thumb.png.3a26788404373a3d6c32ab2822090afc.png

     

    My hack is just to turn the 'material color' to white for the textures on the existing model:

     

    1084801774_ScreenShot2022-09-01at12_09_55PM.thumb.png.67adf71e1687f702385f1fcf41d0d861.png

     

    And the final result is pretty nice:

     

    728484568_ScreenShot2022-09-01at12_19_59PM.thumb.png.216839ebb0146112894d40f42d84b9fc.png

     

    Then you can send this to your layout view as a static image ->

     

    Or you can coordinate the demo elevations, which now look like this:

     

    957733106_ScreenShot2022-09-01at12_44_02PM.thumb.png.ce2f9f50b22d79ef8e792b72b1663c1e.png1118696087_ScreenShot2022-09-01at12_45_15PM.thumb.png.7c9336a2b70f297ccc8d16682eaa7ad6.png

     

    Final product - demo elevations with dashed, colored linework showing demo areas:

     

    275996876_ScreenShot2022-09-01at12_46_31PM.thumb.png.43fa0e7194d1b4922ec543a334a282b6.png

     

    Does anybody have an easier idea? There could probably be some changes to the software to allow for 'plot lines' views with colored + dashed linework (or maybe there already is?) but currently this seems like the best way to do it.

     

    Kyle

     

  8. Just revisiting this again - I wish that each of the different automatic dimension types could be on a different layer, because depending on what you're showing you want different dimensions to show up. For example, I would like my outside corners and perhaps my overall dimension on the roof plan, but I don't need my window centerlines on there. For site plan, I would want just my overall dimensions perhaps. Here they are - I keep overall, outside corners, and centerline dimensions on different layers and show them in different colors so I can keep track of them. It would be great if we could tie the auto-dimensions to these different layers

    Screen Shot 2022-07-28 at 10.29.18 AM.png

  9. 1 hour ago, glennw said:

    Sorry, I accidentally deleted my post trying to edit it.

    You basically need to draw a 12" wide "L" shaped room and raise the floor.

    Keep the original absolute ceiling height. 

     

    This is how I always end up doing it. The Bay/Box window controls are too weak for a finished product, though they are useful during conceptual design

  10. Just checked the MI Residential code section and it looks pretty accurate, even with the later 'Addendum' notes which changed some things like stair rise+run requirements, so looks like they have it up to date. Plus you can see quite a bit of content without an account, just not the photos. Will be bookmarking for future reference and for sharing with builders who may not have a codebook.

     

    So far I just keep a pdf of the code I usually work under, the MI code, which I bought from the icc store: https://shop.iccsafe.org

     

    • Upvote 1
  11. Twinmotion is also a good renderer. Fairly easy to learn and powered by the Epic (think Unreal Engine) core rendering software. It has basically realtime rendering (like physically based) and then you click export to get the final one in about 6 seconds.

     

    I'm just dabbling in in but got some decent results:

     

    Also I'm not sure if this still applies but it was at the time the only one that worked on a Mac.

     

    Image5.thumb.png.53cbae039029042856f84ec143fc7619.png

     

     

    Image1.thumb.png.8c5f9eb9d3b9f76cbcf76f2c87d9a0d4.png

     

    Good Luck!

     

     

    • Upvote 1
  12. I have the M1 Pro on my new macbook and it's blazin' fast I'm so glad I upgraded. Also the fact that X14 has a native mac version didn't hurt either - but so far I have been feeling like the program operates smoothly and with far less lag than before. Hope that helps. I bought a refurbished 'new' Macbook pro and it's been more than enough to handle big models and construction drawings.

    Screen Shot 2022-07-13 at 12.45.20 AM.png

    Screen Shot 2022-07-12 at 5.41.00 PM.png

    • Like 3
  13. On 5/3/2022 at 1:20 PM, Designers_Ink said:

    I started using this one that Rene Rabbitt suggested.  Very clean, no business names cluttering it up like Google Maps, and really easy to just screenshot and drop into my layout.   https://snazzymaps.com/style/130173/ccr-black-and-white.  With it being black and white, it is also easy to add new streets for those projects in brand new subdivisions which are not on the map yet.

     

     

    I like SnazzyMaps too - been using a greyscale one I adopted for Vicinity Maps https://snazzymaps.com/style/6298/subtle-greyscale-grey-roads

  14. Just wanted to chime in here with my first impressions. Overall it's a great update - seems like they did some work 'under the hood' because the overall program seems a lot faster and sleeker. All the actions and things are so much faster - not quite instant like with the mac studio Ryan has but still quite snappy compared to the previous versions. What I really liked is that Layout is much faster than before - they've really sped it up so it works like a CAD program should, without lag. 

     

    It's certainly a game changer when that little bit of lag time is eliminated - very happy about that aspect of the update and it seems to run great with fewer crashes.

     

    • Like 1
  15. 2 hours ago, Gawdzira said:

    There is also a Width and Height field you can activate in the schedule.

     

    This is probably the answer you're looking for. Here's how I do my window schedules - separating width and height so there's no confusion (sometimes those window codes are so ambiguous especially for customers reviewing them)

     

    Here is the basic window schedule, which live on their own 'cad detail' sheet and automatically update - this way I don't recreate details, and they don't have to live on my main modeling sheet off in the corner.

    612482649_ScreenShot2022-04-04at1_32_03PM.thumb.png.ea517f6dd8b285557e3aa0fcb3a6bce1.png

    Set them all up, then you can reference them from a template layout file and you know they'll always be correct.

    2048773997_ScreenShot2022-04-04at1_33_30PM.thumb.png.d92b62fa9155498bf4c7bac0964476ee.png

     

    I also have this one which shows window elevations etc and all the windows are split apart (no double qty etc they are all individual). This goes to the builder when he orders windows, but doesn't appear on the drawing sheets (too big)

     

    441896341_ScreenShot2022-04-04at1_32_13PM.thumb.png.fc29445cc92a9e46df7f024044e4d3d3.png

     

     

    AS for W+Height, those feilds are in the table options you can add them, rename, etc....

     

    1109089413_ScreenShot2022-04-04at1_50_17PM.thumb.png.12f1fa197fe5b027141dc33e747f262c.png

     

    Hope this helps!

     

    Kyle

    • Upvote 2
  16. Thanks! Have deleted it. Anyway I do agree with the post - dimensioning in elevations should be improved. How about having some snaps for what you want to dimension in the elevation, same way they do in plan view?

     

    BTW I'm not sure how the original toolbar layout does it but I keep my snaps off to the right side like this. You could imagine similar for elevation/section snaps.

    Screen Shot 2022-02-21 at 10.17.07 AM.png