BeachHouse1

Members
  • Posts

    129
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BeachHouse1


  1. There is a Field (Column) available to the Schedules that report the "Type" and the "Sub Type" of Objects in the Plan file.

    The Data these Fields contain is inconsistent across different Object Types
     
    In this example, out of 221 Unique objects, 79 of them have a default "Type" field with data created by Chief. 142 of them do not have data in the "Type" Column.
     
    Admittedly, some of the null records have more than one Type of object. 
     
    Obvious omissions are: Appliances, Electrical and Plumbing Fixtures, and Lighting. There are some more.
     
    The questions are
    1. Why is this a partial list?
    2. Is there a way to open up the data in a Global way so hundreds could be updated simultaneously?
     
    These Object "Types" should be modeled after the Tree Structure in the Library. Obviously Chief knows what type of objects these are.

    In this Schedule the Field "Object Type" is Custom and Populated Manually.
     

    image.thumb.png.d04c15c77bec31c693607bab689006bd.png

     


     

  2. On 10/30/2021 at 3:58 AM, Richard_Morrison said:

    Installing through-bolts during a full moon is equally effective as those plate washers. 

    You guys have any wind up there?  Square washer have more surface area.  We build to 150 mph wind loads, every little bit helps.

    Truthfully though, we don't use collar all that much.  We use perlins more and heavier ridge beams. Still, we have negative loads here, that's is different than a snow loads. And then we have the most corrosive environment in the US. so metal straps have to be stainless, or else they disappear in a few years. 

     

     

  3. Has anyone heard of any plans to make an Android reader for chief Plans.
    I'm not asking about the one for viewing renderings and such.  I mean one that reads files so when we are out in the field we can pull up a set of plans on a tablet?

  4. On 4/30/2016 at 11:26 AM, Richard_Morrison said:

    Ceiling ties (i.e. joists) can have a truss effect, if properly nailed. If you tried to use a collar tie for truss forces, it would require so many nails that the wood would split. (Same is true for ceiling joists in a low pitched roof.) Also, for a truss effect, you really need "triangles" of framing. If you think you are getting any real truss-like benefit out of a collar tie (i.e. in the top third of the rafter) you are deluding yourself.

    Not if you thru bolt them, with large square washers.

     

  5. On 3/20/2020 at 2:44 PM, Alaskan_Son said:

     

    Just a side note on this, but we've actually created this type of look by just purchasing a plain old solid core smooth panel blank and routering the grooves with a standard V-groove router bit. 

    IMG_0311.thumb.JPG.784f3342e323b81c8404c604438cf663.JPG

    I was SUPER happy with the end results after staining and sealing too.  It was either that or order the door to be imported from Europe for like $800 plus shipping.  I originally had my doubts about how the laminated veneer would handle it, but it worked without hitch.

     

     

    We did the same exact thing.  They looked great. Untill now I though I was the only one to ever do that.

  6. On 7/5/2020 at 3:11 PM, DavidJPotter said:

    I think turning "Object Snaps" off would be what I would do if I do not want line entities to "snap" together, try that. I usually leave Object Snaps ON but only turn it off when I wish objects and lines not to snap together.

     

    DJP

    Those are completely different commands.  I always want to have object snap turned on, and separate from that sometimes to connect and sometime not.  Dermot has a good solution.

    For construction lines, never.  When making polylines, yes.

     

     

     

  7. 2 hours ago, robdyck said:

    In a camera view, use the delete surface tool to remove the underside. Then, convert the stairs to a symbol and place in the exact same location as the stairs. Use the layer display settings to turn off the real stairs and show the new stair symbol. Use these settings for affected 3d views only. In plan views, turn the symbol off and keep the stairs on.

     

    Or manually draw and place a riser surface. It's not as hard as it may seem. Draw one, at the bottom and get it right. Then using the information from the stair dialog box, replicate this riser the correct amount (in x or y and z axis) and the correct # of times using the absolute location setting. 

    Thanks, I had  actually been  thinking about experimenting with the second option. Although the first option sounds good because you have to do something similar when displaying exterior stairs in multi floor designs.

    Gonna give it a try.  I/m making a series of videos on Beach Houses.  I'm going to include your solution in the stair portion.  I'll give you a credit and send you a link.

    Thanks again.

  8. This actual photo shows a basic exterior stairway configuration.

    If Open Riser is selected there is no underside skin on the stairs.  If Open Riser is not selected an underside skin is displayed. I tried a work around of making the skin material glass.  From the back side of the stairs no riser is displayed, from the front the riser is displayed.   

    Any ideas?

     

    Thanks







     

    IMG_20201204_105951.jpg

    2021-02-27 (1).png.jpg

    2021-02-27.png.jpg

  9. Thanks Shane,  That's not really what I'm looking for.  

    This program was really not designed to do complex decks, with opening for stairs and rail post of different widths and heights.  And for moving the outer rim boards and planking.

    But I'm getting closer to having some hard won work arounds.